Podcast: Play in new window | Download
Podcast: Play in new window | Download
Genesis 21 (ESV)
Luke 15
Podcast: Play in new window | Download
Luke 15
1 Now the tax collectors and sinners were all drawing near to hear him. 2 And the Pharisees and the scribes grumbled, saying, “This man receives sinners and eats with them.” 3 So he told them this parable: 4 “What man of you, having a hundred sheep, if he has lost one of them, does not leave the ninety-nine in the open country, and go after the one that is lost, until he finds it? 5 And when he has found it, he lays it on his shoulders, rejoicing. 6 And when he comes home, he calls together his friends and his neighbors, saying to them, ‘Rejoice with me, for I have found my sheep that was lost.’ 7 Just so, I tell you, there will be more joy in heaven over one sinner who repents than over ninety-nine righteous persons who need no repentance. 8 “Or what woman, having ten silver coins, if she loses one coin, does not light a lamp and sweep the house and seek diligently until she finds it? 9 And when she has found it, she calls together her friends and neighbors, saying, ‘Rejoice with me, for I have found the coin that I had lost.’ 10 Just so, I tell you, there is joy before the angels of God over one sinner who repents.” 11 And he said, “There was a man who had two sons. 12 And the younger of them said to his father, ‘Father, give me the share of property that is coming to me.’ And he divided his property between them. 13 Not many days later, the younger son gathered all he had and took a journey into a far country, and there he squandered his property in reckless living. 14 And when he had spent everything, a severe famine arose in that country, and he began to be in need. 15 So he went and hired himself out to one of the citizens of that country, who sent him into his fields to feed pigs. 16 And he was longing to be fed with the pods that the pigs ate, and no one gave him anything. 17 “But when he came to himself, he said, ‘How many of my father’s hired servants have more than enough bread, but I perish here with hunger! 18 I will arise and go to my father, and I will say to him, “Father, I have sinned against heaven and before you. 19 I am no longer worthy to be called your son. Treat me as one of your hired servants.” ’ 20 And he arose and came to his father. But while he was still a long way off, his father saw him and felt compassion, and ran and embraced him and kissed him. 21 And the son said to him, ‘Father, I have sinned against heaven and before you. I am no longer worthy to be called your son.’22 But the father said to his servants, ‘Bring quickly the best robe, and put it on him, and put a ring on his hand, and shoes on his feet. 23 And bring the fattened calf and kill it, and let us eat and celebrate. 24 For this my son was dead, and is alive again; he was lost, and is found.’ And they began to celebrate. 25 “Now his older son was in the field, and as he came and drew near to the house, he heard music and dancing. 26 And he called one of the servants and asked what these things meant. 27 And he said to him, ‘Your brother has come, and your father has killed the fattened calf, because he has received him back safe and sound.’ 28 But he was angry and refused to go in. His father came out and entreated him, 29 but he answered his father, ‘Look, these many years I have served you, and I never disobeyed your command, yet you never gave me a young goat, that I might celebrate with my friends. 30 But when this son of yours came, who has devoured your property with prostitutes, you killed the fattened calf for him!’ 31 And he said to him, ‘Son, you are always with me, and all that is mine is yours. 32 It was fitting to celebrate and be glad, for this your brother was dead, and is alive; he was lost, and is found.’ ”
Podcast: Play in new window | Download
On a Sabbath, while he was going through the grainfields, his disciples plucked and ate some heads of grain, rubbing them in their hands. 2 But some of the Pharisees said, “Why are you doing what is not lawful to do on the Sabbath?” 3 And Jesus answered them, “Have you not read what David did when he was hungry, he and those who were with him: 4 how he entered the house of God and took and ate the bread of the Presence, which is not lawful for any but the priests to eat, and also gave it to those with him?” 5 And he said to them, “The Son of Man is lord of the Sabbath.”6 On another Sabbath, he entered the synagogue and was teaching, and a man was there whose right hand was withered. 7 And the scribes and the Pharisees watched him, to see whether he would heal on the Sabbath, so that they might find a reason to accuse him. 8 But he knew their thoughts, and he said to the man with the withered hand, “Come and stand here.” And he rose and stood there. 9 And Jesus said to them, “I ask you, f is it lawful on the Sabbath to do good or to do harm, to save life or to destroy it?” 10 And after looking around at them all he said to him, “Stretch out your hand.” And he did so, and his hand was restored. 11 But they were filled with fury and discussed with one another what they might do to Jesus.
1 How lovely is your dwelling place,O Lord of hosts!2 My soul longs, yes, faintsfor the courts of the Lord;my heart and flesh sing for joyto the living God.3 Even the sparrow finds a home,and the swallow a nest for herself,where she may lay her young,at your altars, O Lord of hosts,my King and my God.4 Blessed are those who dwell in your house,ever singing your praise!5 Blessed are those whose strength is in you,in whose heart are the highways to Zion.8 O Lord God of hosts, hear my prayer;give ear, O God of Jacob!9 Behold our shield, O God;look on the face of your anointed!10 For a day in your courts is betterthan a thousand elsewhere.I would rather be a doorkeeper in the house of my Godthan dwell in the tents of wickedness.11 For the Lord God is a sun and shield;the Lord bestows favor and honor.No good thing does he withholdfrom those who walk uprightly.12 O Lord of hosts,blessed is the one who trusts in you!
Review of God and Caesar – Selected Essays on Religion, Politics & Society, by Cardinal George Pell.
Edited by M.A. Casey; published by Connor Court in Australia, the Catholic University of America Press everywhere else.
Less that 190 pages, this is a collection of ten essays by Australia’s foremost Roman Catholic cleric.
The topics covered include: The Law and Morality, Catholicism and Democracy, The Case for God and Human Dignity, Human Rights and Moral Responsibility.
Quite readable generally, most of the essays flow in a very conversational way which reflects their origins as speeches. I’m not overly familiar with Roman Catholic doctrine & semantics, but I was able to understand most of what Pell was trying to say.
In as much as the book has a central theme it is the rejection of the primacy of conscience.
There is a widespread view amongst religious and non-religious Australians that people should follow their conscience in almost all things. Do the best you can, and it will all come out in the wash.
Pell refers to this as the ‘Daffy Duck Heresy’. If someone sincerely tries to do the right thing, well, that’s all that matters.
Pell’s answer is that people should submit their consciences to God (and of course by implication, the Roman Catholic Church).
While I agree with his central premise that we must submit our consciences to God, the rub for the Protestant comes when determining what the will of God is. For the Roman Catholic, it is easy: what does the Church say the will of God is?
Of course, we have a ‘great cloud of witnesses’ in Calvin, Luther, Spurgeon, Hoeksma & etc to turn to, but ultimately, far more responsibility is put on the conscience of the Reformed Christian than the devout Roman Catholic. We are called to test what we read and hear with a Berean spirit, and ultimately, decide for ourselves what the will of God is.
Cardinal Pell is a bit of an institution here in Australia. As he points out in this book, roughly 50% of the Australians found in a church each Sunday are Catholics attending Mass. Along with Peter Jensen, the Anglican Archbishop of Sydney, he is the ‘goto guy’ when the media wants a comment from a prominent religious conservative.
Unlike America, Australia does not have a strong Baptist movement. We have no Jerry Falwells, no Pat Buchanans, no James Dobsons. Whether this is a good thing or not is another discussion, but the fact is that for most Australians, the pro-life movement is represented in Australia by Cardinal Pell.
It will come as no surprise then that this book contains a strong argument for pro-life values. I think it will be Australia’s loss when Cardinal Pell passes from public life, as I am not aware of any other champion of the unborn within the Roman Catholic Church in Australia, certainly not in the caliber of Pell.
My main criticism of the book is the way it ignores the massive & vital role of Protestantism and the Reformation in the development of modern democracy.
Pell puts it euphemistically; “The Catholic Church was slow to give public approval to democracy.” Indeed.
Still, I would recommend this book to anyone interested in the intersection of faith and civil government, especially in Australia.
Three stars.
I was reading Blackfive today (an excellent US milblog) and saw this post linked.
It’s a great piece written by a (AFAIK) non-Christian former soldier (Marine perhaps) about Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder. (emphasis mine)
What you need to know, first and last, is that so-called PTSD is not an illness. It is a normal condition for people who have been through what you have been through. The instinct to kill and war is native to humanity. It is very deeply rooted in me, as it is in you. We have rules and customs to restrain it, so that sometimes we may have peace. What you are experiencing is not an illness, but the awareness of what human nature is like deep down. It is the awareness of what life is like without the walls that protect civilization.
Those who have never been outside those walls don’t know: they can’t see. The walls form their horizon. You know what lays beyond them, and can’t forget it.
It got me thinking on a few things.
Firstly, just how sheltered most of us are from death in this day and age. I’ve been reading about the Black Plague, which saw 1/3rd of people in Europe killed. These days, we can go our whole lives without seeing a person die, and only knowing one or two close people who have died of something other than old age.
It’s hard imagining a whole society suffering from PTSD, but if you think about it, people must have been. Imagine the people of Israel in Joshua’s day. Imagine a Hebrew soldier, returning to his tents and his family after taking part in the slaughter of every man, woman and child in a Caananite city. Despite the justice of their actions, surely it was a hard thing to do.
Secondly and mainly, it got me thinking about Total Depravity. If you operate on the basic assumption that all people are basically and fundamentally evil, even if they superficially or outwardly seem good, the world makes a lot more sense.
We have the notion of the fundamental goodness of people drummed into our heads from a young age. We want to believe that people are good. Yet history, experience and common sense teaches us otherwise.
Of course, the idea that people are fundamentally good means the only thing keeping people from goodness is education. If we could only build a society that taught people how to live properly, people would be good, and we wouldn’t need God! When people come from a society like ours, which has this assumption, and are plunged through combat or some other traumatic experience, it must be twice the shock.
I just wanted to outline my plans for this blog before I jumped in.
I’ve grown up in a small conservative Reformed (well, Presbyterian, but you know) denomination, which I love dearly.
A while back, I started to question some fundamentals of Reformed belief, mainly in the area of Sola Scriptura and Ecclesiology. For a long time, I just kept ‘asking questions’ and waited for the answer to come. As a student of history, I feel quite attracted to the arguments put by the Orthodox and Roman Catholic Churches with regards to the role of the Church in authenticating Scripture, but I am convinced of God’s sovereignty and the doctrine of predestination. A conundrum!
So instead of waiting for the answer to my questions to come to me through osmosis, I’ve taken up my daily devotions and prayer again, and am reading as much Reformed material as I can. Hopefully, this blog will be a part of that process. I want to not only attend a Reformed Church, but to be able to defend (or at least have an educated opinion on) every part of Christian Doctrine. I want to be the spiritual leader in my home, not the-most-educated-but-the-one-with-the-biggest-doubts.
My plan is to review the books I read, post on the devotions I’m reading through (the Psalms privately, Judges as a family), and whatever else comes to mind with regards to the Christian Walk.
I have a background in politics (studying it in Uni, and working for a few years as a staffer to a few politicians), and I used to spending most of my spare time reading about anything to do with it. But to be honest, I’m a little over politics at the moment. I’m going to try and pretend it all doesn’t exist for a while, and focus on more personal spiritual matters for a time.
Anyway, hopefully this exercise is a blessing for all involved. I’ve never blogged or kept a diary seriously before.
Podcast: Play in new window | Download
Luke 4:1-13
It’s been some time since Pastor Whitenack covered the baptism of Jesus and, before him, Sam taught on John’s baptism. I might normally try to bring you up to date right away but I’ll be getting back to both later on this evening in order to place Christ’s temptation into a proper context for us to understand it.
This passage is pretty well known by many Christians. I suppose it sticks in most minds the same way the Prodigal Son passage does as it is regularly read and taught in Christian pulpits. Yet, I believe, that today, most people don’t really appreciate what it is that is significant about Christ’s temptation. There are many details in Christ’s life, including miracles, that are not recorded. There are even some details only recorded in a single Gospel. Why is the temptation of Christ recorded in three Gospels? What is it that the reader is supposed to take away that makes him wise toward salvation? How you answer that question, I believe, will reveal whether or not you understand the Gospels.
In Luke 3:22, after Christ is baptized, He is filled with the Holy Spirit and the Father announces: “You are my beloved Son, with you I am well pleased.”
Here in Chapter 4, we see the Devil is now going to tempt Jesus with this very declaration. Not only once but twice Satan introduces his temptations by saying: “If you are the Son of God.” All Satan knows how to do is ape Truth and mock it in the process.
Man fell into sin and death when the first Adam, as mankind’s representative, yielded to the temptation of the devil. Even so, as Jesus was about to begin His public ministry it is fitting that the last Adam, the representative of all who trust in Him, should resist the devil’s temptation and render perfect obedience to God.
I think it’s really important to point out that, though Christ was without sin, He was truly tempted. One of the earliest heresies of the Church that has plagued her history throughout is the error that Christ is either not human at all and just appears to be or that His divinity mixes with His humanity to make Him sort of a hybrid. I think some of us might not be so sophisticated to be rank heretics but we’re prone to thinking of Jesus as perhaps floating through life as if nothing could really hurt Him or tempt Him. We confess with the Scriptures, though, that Christ is fully human even as He is fully divine. He was tempted in every way but did not sin.
Now Paul, in his Epistle to the Corinthians, promises us that we are not tempted beyond what we can bear under. That is to say, that God in His rich mercy is able to restrain the Evil One in how we are tempted in this life so that we are able to escape temptation. Even with the Lord’s restraint, because we are so weak, our temptation often seems unbearable, don’t they? The training wheels are on but we still fall.
If temptation is according to the strength of the person being tempted then who could possibly be tempted any more powerfully than Christ Himself? Do you doubt that Christ understood temptation? Beloved, it’s you that doesn’t know what the full weight of temptation is! It is we who have never felt the weight of temptation without restraint. We have a strong Savior who was able to bear under this temptation in a way that you and I will never appreciate. Indeed, we do have a merciful High Priest who is able to patiently bear with us weak sinners because He knows what it is to be tempted and He knows our frame!
Now, as we continue, it is the height of understatement that Christ was hungry at the end of 40 days of fasting and prayer in the wilderness. This is when the temptation begins.
The Devil approached Him with utter derision as he challenged Christ, if He’s the Son of God, to turn stones into bread.
You’re hungry, Jesus! Why not use some of that majestic power of yours? Dazzle me! You’ve got Holy Spirit power! God wants us to have our best life now! Turn stones into bread and amaze us all with your authority over the created order. After all, you were there at the beginning, were you not, and all things are created through you? Prove it!
Compare this temptation to the temptation of Adam. Adam had not gone without food for any length of time. Even if Adam had been hungry at the time of temptation he could simply walk to any other tree and eat as much as he needed. Finally, Adam was living in paradise when he was tempted while Christ was in the middle of a desert.
Jesus responds by quoting Deuteronomy 8:3. Moses told this to the Israelites who, for forty years, had seen the power of God in the wilderness. Even when no bread was to be found, God had provided manna from heaven to care for His saints. Yet, with all that, the Israelites had complained and rebelled against God any time they were deprived of food and water for a short time. They lived by their bellies and distrusted God at the drop of a hat.
Christ responds to Satan by stating, in effect, “Tempter, you are wrong about man. In order to satisfy hunger and stay alive you think that bread is absolutely necessary. You are wrong you liar! I declare to you that it isn’t bread but the creative, lifegiving, and sustaining power of God that is the indispensable source of life and well-being!”
Failing in this temptation, Satan tempts Christ with the dominion of the world and its governments if He will do but one small thing: bow before him. Christ must worship the devil and he will give Him all that he has been given. Now, was Satan really the possessor of all of these? I don’t believe he was. Satan is the father of lies and it’s clear he’s either lying to Christ here or is lying to himself about his own dominion. After all, even during Christ’s humiliation on this earth, Satan was able to do nothing more than Christ allowed him to do. Demon expulsions and other events of the NT see Christ’s power breaks through and He is, indeed, able to overcome the strong man when and where He pleases.
How is this a temptation to Christ then? It is a temptation to obtain the crown without enduring the cross! This was able to form a great struggle within Him for we know that the Cross was the path for Christ to redeem His people. It would be the path of shame that would lead to glory for Christ and His own. It would be His obedience to death and then His raising from the dead that would perfect His work. He knew the agony He would have to suffer when the wrath of God would be poured out on Him and this is a foretaste of the struggle in Gethsemane.
Satan offered Christ the default religion of man: the way of glory. We would build ourselves up, convincing ourselves that our righteousness would please the Father apart from the Cross; for, to admit that Christ had to die on a Cross, is to admit our utter shame and disgusting sin that we bear. We are repulsed by the Cross because we are repulsed by the idea that our sin is so graphic, so hideous, so monstrous, that the Son of God would have to be smitten for us. But Christ endured the shame so that He might redeem those who look to the Cross as their only hope and He overcame this temptation for our sake.
Finally, Satan took Jesus to the pinnacle of the Temple and, again mocking His status as the Son of God, challenged Jesus to throw Himself down to the ground. After all, Satan noted that the Scriptures promise in Psalm 91 that God will protect the righteous man in all his righteous ways.
“See what the Scriptures say,” reasoned Satan, “God promises that His angels will not only break your fall, they will do more. Very tenderly they will bear you up lest you, wearing only sandals, should hurt yourself by striking your foot against one of the sharp stones.”
Have you noticed Satan is actually providing a bit of truth here. He’s correctly quoted the Scriptures and is “proof-texting” the Scriptures.
But Satan can only ape Truth. He has no wisdom. He’s a fool. He has no spiritual discernment and so he mishandles Scripture like a clumsy, foolish teenager who just read some Richard Dawkins book. How often, beloved, have you seen Atheists collect verses in a haphazard manner in a facile attempt to demonstrate that God contradicts Himself? I believe this is a grave sin of infantile exegesis. It is not the path of wisdom. It is the way of heretics and unstable men. Every heretic in Church history has claimed that they’re simply teaching what the Scriptures teach and I would caution you to closely examine a man and not simply follow him because he can vainly quote a few Scriptures.
If you look at this temptation, basically what Satan is telling Christ to do is to experiment with God’s promises. He had to distrust God in order to do an experiment and, then, if it works out, God’s promise is true.
Christ responds by quoting Deuteronomy 6:16, which calls to mind the rebellion of the Israelites in Exodus 17:1-7 at a place called Massah and Meribah where they put God on trial and rebelled against Moses because they were thirsty. They accused God before Moses of cruelly bringing out their families and livestock only to die in the desert and provocatively challenged God by saying: “Is Jehovah among us or not?!” The Israelites in the desert are pictured as unbelieving and rebellious throughout the Old Testament and, especially in Book of Hebrews, we are warned not to be distrustful and faithless as they.
Christ knows that Satan’s proposal has nothing to do with humbly trusting in the protecting care promised in Psalm 91 and so He answers that God is not to be tempted.
Life gives us plenty of examples of the kind of false confidence that is similar to what Satan urged on Jesus. People will pray to God for the blessings of health and then be gluttons with food or drink. A man will pray to God to save his soul but will neglect the very means of grace that God has given him: study of the Scripture, church attendance, the Sacraments, and living to the glory of God. Someone will plead with the Lord for the spiritual well-being of his children but will never take the time to pray with them, to catechize them, to discipline them, or to display a repentant spirit before them. A man was once admonished for going into a peep show and defended himself by saying: “I do not deny that I went in there but, all the while, I was constantly praying: “Turn away my eyes from beholding vanity!”
You shall not put the Lord thy God to the test!
And so, having passed these tests, Satan left Christ. Christ resisted the devil. Christ overcame the Strong man and the Strong man was overcome. Jesus used the Word as His weapon in all cases for in the Word is the truth. The Word is truth and the Word became flesh to overcome the darkness that hated the light.
Now, the thing that really concerns me about such a passage is what I said before: how you view this passage determines whether you understand the Gospel. Is Christ merely the ultimate example for Godly living for you? Did you strap on your What Would Jesus Do? bracelet as you were listening to this and vow that you would be “on fire” for God and overcome evil by trusting in God’s Word?
I remember listening to a Sermon on the Gospel once in horror as the Preacher proclaimed that he was going to get back to the basics of the Gospel and this was the Gospel he proclaimed: Jesus came to be an example to us about how to live for God.
Beloved, if you believe that Christ is merely your example for holiness, then I fear you do not know the Gospel at all. If Christ is just someone you aspire to be like then I fear you may be dead in your sins and trespasses. The real question for you in this passage is not “What would Jesus do?” but “What has Jesus done?!”
We need to back up for a moment into Luke Chapter 3 and hear the Prophet John, a prophet of the Old Covenant, as he sees the people coming out to the banks of the Jordan to be baptized.
Listen to him as he prophecies about you: “You brood of vipers! Who warned you to flee from the wrath to come? Bear fruits in keeping with repentance!”
Oh how the righteous man will simply turn away and say: “I’m not a viper! I’m a good person. I devote myself to God! I’m sold out for God!”
But the man who knows the Law and its perfect demand hears these words and they lay bear his sin. The Law of God reveals God’s perfect requirements and awakens to sin and the curse of the Law for it. Such a man heard these words of John and beat his chest and said: “You’re right! I am a viper! I have no right to come to these waters on my own merit. I have no right to ask God yet again to forgive my sins. I am hopeless and I don’t know what else to do so I repent of my sin and plead the mercy of God. Cleanse my conscience from sin!”
I imagine the people were so overcome with grief that they didn’t even notice a man from Nazareth walk up. There was nothing in His appearance that would cause them to turn their heads. He was from a poor family in a despised region of Galilee. Pay attention to what this Man is doing because none of the others noticed that their salvation was coming in a Man of no reputation.
He walked up to John and John knew better. Jesus didn’t need to repent but He had to be baptized. Beloved, in His baptism, Christ identified Himself with all those men and women desperate for the burden of their sin to be taken away. He was of them in His baptism. He came to represent all those who came with nothing in their hands as they cried out to the Lord for salvation from their sin.
Water can represent cleansing but it also represents judgement. The New Testament says that Noah’s family was baptized in the ark and that Moses and the Israelites were baptized as they passed through the Red Sea on dry ground. The wrath of God poured out in a flood on God’s enemies but the baptized received a sprinkling and were cleansed.
These people didn’t realize it at the time but they were getting a little wet while the Savior was baptized to identify with them and take on their judgment. Even as God’s wrath was piled up in a heap as the sins of the people collected and offended a Holy God, Christ was baptized to say: “I will take this wrath! I will be the satisfaction. I will be the sacrifice.” Christ began His ministry with a baptism because He would be baptized with the full wrath of God on the Cross for His people. He was clean while His own wer sinful. His people became clean while He received the wrath for Sin that they deserved.
But, beloved, it doesn’t stop with His baptism. You should have been leaning forward in anticipation as you read of His lonely walk into the desert. We are at the waters edge. Are they waters of judgment or of cleansing? We look knowingly as Jesus walks alone into the desert and know we cannot follow Him into that temptation. Will my Savior withstand temptation for me? Will my Savior succeed?! O God He must, I have no other hope for righteousness!
He did obey! He is the righteous one!
Luke tells Theophilus that the purpose of this story was to provide certainty concerning the truths of the Gospel. Do you desire the certainty that God intends good for you in the Gospel? Are you weary and heavy laden by your sin? How can God love someone who has sinned like me?! You have no idea how wicked I am! Nobody can sin like me and be a Christian! Though I desire the good, I sin. Though I tell myself “That’s the last time I sin like that!”, I fail yet again. Who will deliver me from this body of death?!
A Savior, strong to save, walked alone into the desert because He knew we couldn’t follow. He walked into that desert alone and bore the weight of temptation because of a consuming love for His own. Beloved, believe the Gospel not because you have enough love for God to save yourself but because the Son of God had enough love for you to save you to the uttermost!
Have you ever stopped and asked yourself why a church has (or should have) a youth ministry? Youth ministry is never talked about in any of Paul’s epistles and there really isn’t much of a precedent for separating youth in the isolated way most churches do. This questions is one that every person involved with youth ministry should be able to answer. From the senior pastor, to the elders, to parents, to volunteers, to the paid youth worker.
As I began to think about this question one thing that popped into my mind is that fact that most parents in the church don’t live up to their responsibilities. Most parents don’t catechize their children, teach them the scriptures, or do any sort of ‘home church’ activities. Scripture is pretty clear about who’s responsibility children are (Deuteronomy 6). Parents should do these things. However, for the most part parents have abdicated their responsibilities and taken a laissez-faire approach to their children’s spirituality. Many parents then look to the church, to the youth pastor, or even look to their children to find their own way. This isn’t an article about parenting, but because of a lack of spiritual guidance youth ministry becomes necessary.
One one hand a youth worker is simply a member of the congregation that has taken vows to the covenant children of the church to do all possible to the end that the children profess faith in Christ and are faithful to him. In this way, a youth worker is no different than any other member of the church. At the very least most churches in the reformed tradition value and actually have their members take vows when a child is baptized saying that they will pray for, and be a part of spiritual life of this child.
I think the big misconception in youth ministry (it’s a misconception by parents, elders, students, and youth minsters themselves) is that a youth pastor is or should be the primary spiritual cause in a student’s life. As mentioned earlier, scripture clearly states that parents are responsible for their own children. The bible teaches of three spiritual causes in a child’s life. The first is not surprisingly God Himself. 1 Corinthians 12:3 tells us that, “no one can say, “Jesus is Lord,” except by the Holy Spirit.” God is the primary cause in a child’s life. In the wisdom of God he ordained that children are brought up by Parents. (Deuteronomy 6, Ephesians 6:1-4) And finally way down the list the church and the fellowship of believers is the third cause in a child’s life. Although this responsibility falls to the congregation as a whole, in the wisdom of the church, it has been appropriate to appoint and set apart certain individuals for youth and children’s ministry.
I don’t want to be a parent to every child in my youth group, I can’t be a child to every parent in my youth group. This is not the youth pastor’s job. The youth pastor is a tertiary cause in a child’s life. But there are two main roles that I see a youth pastor filling.
First, there are numerous students that don’t have parents. Either through divorce, or death, or the unbelief of one or both parents, often times students come to my ministry as spiritual or actual orphans. This is the historic reason for having a youth pastor in a church. After WWII there were many children without a dad. The church filled the need by hiring or getting volunteers to disciple and care for these children. I take this part of my job very seriously. I seek out the students who don’t have a dad, or whose dad left their mom. These students more than anything need a man to step into their life and speak the truth of scripture. An elder could do this, a member of the church could do this, however, as a full time youth pastor, I have the time, the resources, and the gifting to do this as well.
The second main role as I see it is to supplement parents. As I said before a youth pastor can’t and shouldn’t want to take over the parents role. If they do, you have a problem. But as any parent knows, sometimes a little help is great. I equip parents by giving them good books, praying for them, and encouraging them. Often times I will teach something to a student and they will finally understand it, even though the student’s parent has been saying the exact same thing for years. It’s not that I am better at teaching, or anything like that. But sometimes an outside voice can be helpful. As a full time youth minister (and one educated at Seminary) I can spend more time preparing a Sunday School lesson and probably go into more depth than a parent normally could. In this way I can assist the parent in growing and educating their child to maturity as a tertiary spiritual cause.
If the church was perfect and all its members were mature Christians who lived obedient lives to Christ, I wouldn’t have a job. But it’s not. So my job is to shepherd the orphans and to be a tertiary cause in the lives of our covenant youth.
Ben Shear is the Youth Pastor at Knox Presbyterian Church in Michigan. He also runs the website Reformed Youth Pastor.com More articles like this at Reformed Youth Pastor.com
They Said That?
* “It changed my perception of what it meant to follow Christ.”
* “”¦[it] is so wonderfully biblically congruent, I would encourage folks to not stumble over parts [that are disagreeable]”¦”
* “[it] showed the depth of Christ’s love.”
Wow. That must have been a powerful sermon for these pastors to respond so strongly! These are the responses that we should have more of when faithful preaching occurs! But there was no preaching there. These are the responses by respected pastors, such as Chuck Smith, Jr. of California, after they reviewed the Passion.
I am sure some of you saw that coming. But is it not true what this article has been arguing for: the dangers of images readily supplanting the Word. In light of the centrality of the Word as found in the Bible consider these alarming quotes:
* “This film is equal to “˜a lifetime of sermons'” (Billy Graham, People, March 8, 2004).
* “The best outreach opportunity in 2000 years” (People).
* “In the church we’ve tried for a long time with words to bring into consciousness the reality of what Jesus went through. We have waxed eloquent in our sermons, but this film brings that reality to us in one sitting.” (Chuck Smith, Jr., “Pastor’s Panel”, www.worshipleader.com).
Yes, I am picking on this film. Why not? If the Reformed faith is to be relevant in today’s society, it needs to interact with fellow Christians and to address modern trends. Again, movies and television shows are not inherently evil as a medium of communication, but they can become sinful through wrong means and goals. Just as we avoid certain movies because of their excessive themes (nudity, language, etc.), so, too, movies that violate the second commandment should be avoided. This can be very controversial, but rather than rehash what was written earlier, hopefully, these quotes from Christianity Today, which recommends the movie even after admitting its clear and pronounced Roman Catholic motif, will be eye-opening:
* He [Gibson] also recounted a series of divine coincidences that led him to read the works of Anne Catherin Emmerich, a late-18th”¦Westphalian nun who had visions of the events of the Passion. Many of the details needed to fill out the Gospel accounts he drew from her book, Dolorous Passion of Our Lord”¦
* One reason for Gibson’s personal sense of salvation is the way this project rescued him from himself”¦
* These [medieval] practices [projecting oneself into the event] became the foundation for such widely practiced traditions as meditating on the Five Sorrowful Mysteries when saying the Rosary. The structure of Gibson’s film conforms exactly to the list of the Five Sorrowful Mysteries: The Agony of Jesus in the Garden, the Scourging of Jesus at the Pillar, the Crowning with Thorns, the Carrying the Cross, and the Crucifixion and Death of Jesus. And it reveals the way that this film is for Gibson a kind of prayer”¦
* In the foreword to The Passion, he [Gibson] writes that the film “is not meant as a historical documentary. “¦ I think of it as contemplative in the sense that one is compelled to remember “¦ in a spiritual way, which cannot be articulated, only experienced.”
* [Gibson]”I’ve been actually amazed at the way I would say the evangelical audience has””hands down””responded to this film more than any other Christian group.” [What makes it so amazing, he says, is that] “the film is so Marian.”
All quotes from www.christianitytoday.com/movies/special/passionofthechrist.html)
Gibson considers himself an old-fashioned pre-Vatican II Roman Catholic. Gibson calls Mary “a tremendous co-redemptrix and mediatrix [meaning she contributed to redemption through her suffering].” Thus, the movie has more about Mary than the Bible, as shown in an article by Romanus Cessario, a Dominican who teaches at St. John’s Seminary:
We see Mary’s maternal mediation enacted on film. Gibson portrays Mary placing “herself between her Son and mankind [remember the times that Mary looks directly at us!] in the reality of their wants, needs and sufferings [remember Peter at her feet]. She puts herself ‘in the middle,’ that is to say she acts as a mediatrix not as an outsider, but in her position as mother.” The words are from Pope John Paul II. Mel Gibson captures what the Pope writes in “Mother of the Redeemer” in a way that alone merits the film the title “Catholic.”
If we recognize that the Passion is related to the Church, then we also recognize that it is related to the reality of the Eucharistic conversion. There is a sense in which the whole film is about the Eucharist. The Bread of Life. (Bracketed comments also by Cessario; www.catholic.org, “Mel Gibson and Thomas Aquinas: How the Passion Works”)
The Roman Catholic has always depended heavily on images; some of the older living generation can still remember the mass being delivered in Latin! In contrast, the Protestant Church has traditionally relied upon Christ and His Word as the source of spiritual vitality in the Church and in the family. When many Evangelical leaders laud this film to the detriment of the preached Word, we can see clearly the sad state of the Protestant Church. There is no passion for the Word.
What It All Means
Coming full-circle, we as Reformed believers in the twenty-first century need to embrace Christ through the Word. The Second Commandment forbids images of the Godhead and man-made worship; it also demands a proper integration of the Word into our lives. The modern pressures upon the Churches and families are immense: all the books and conferences try to evangelize others and grow spiritually through every means””save one. We need to believe God when He says that preachers are a gift from Christ (Eph. 4:8-12). We need to believe God that His Word is sufficient for our spiritual growth. We need to consume the Bible through reading, listening and memorizing. These truths should not only be taught to our children but also enacted in our lives such that they see the Word impacting our living, reading and watching””our very lifestyle. This does not mean that the TV should be thrown out (or it might for some of us), but it does mean we should seriously pray and consider its impact on our family.
Emphasis on reading and writing, listening and learning through words and especially the Word of God will help guard our eye-gates and strengthen our resolve. For it is by faith in Christ by His Word that we have life (Jn. 6:63).
“For, All flesh is as grass, And all the glory thereof as the flower of grass. The grass withereth, and the flower falleth: But the word of the Lord abideth for ever. And this is the word of good tidings which was preached unto you” (1 Peter 1:24). Amen.